home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1074 / 1074r047.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  83KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky
OCR: interpretation would deprive statutory provision of virtually all effect court should not affirm the agency 's interpretation absent legislative history exceptional clarity. American Fed'n af Gov't Employees 798 F.2d 1525, 1529 (D.C. Cir. 1986). quoting Ameri Fed'n of Gov't Employees Local 2782 F.L.R. 702 F.2d 1183, 1187 {D.C Cir 1983}. Third. the DOL'S interpretation of 8401{b)(2} is not entitled deference because i1 recentiy position FrSt espoused in this Court and unsupported by prior regula- tlons, rulings or administrative practices See discussion Sections B-D below The post hoc nature of the DOLs most re cent position demonstrated by tt inabillty to accept the puooos Circuit's invitation in this case submit an amicus brief." The DOL seeks oxplain this failure by reference the coropli ...